🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". A law may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this global discussion evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that states globally are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.